I was the one testing M34192199.. I started in november and it just finished a couple weeks ago and it was not prime

Alex

On 6/29/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
Send Prime mailing list submissions to
         [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://hogranch.com/mailman/listinfo/prime
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Prime digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Exponent already tested. (Chris Marble)
   2. Re: Exponent already tested. (Brian J. Beesley)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 22:27:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: Chris Marble <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
Subject: [Prime] Exponent already tested.
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

I've been testing M34192199 for a couple of weeks.  Starting on
June 20 my prime.log file's been reporting:
ERROR 11: Exponent already tested.

I haven't tested the exponent previously and I was issued it on
May 30.  Is it useful to complete the testing?  Will it at least
count as a double-check?
--
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] - HMC UNIX Systems Manager
  My opinions are my own and probably don't represent anything anyway.


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 06:49:49 +0000
From: "Brian J. Beesley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Prime] Exponent already tested.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],    The Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search
        list <[email protected]>
Message-ID: < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="iso-8859-1"

On Wednesday 29 June 2005 05:27, Chris Marble wrote:
> I've been testing M34192199 for a couple of weeks.  Starting on
> June 20 my prime.log file's been reporting:
> ERROR 11: Exponent already tested.
>
> I haven't tested the exponent previously and I was issued it on
> May 30.

I guess someone had it before you, let it time out but carried on & reported
the result when it finished. Either that or the server database is screwed up.

> Is it useful to complete the testing?  Will it at least
> count as a double-check?

Yes.

Regards
Brian Beesley


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Prime mailing list
[email protected]
http://hogranch.com/mailman/listinfo/prime


End of Prime Digest, Vol 14, Issue 15
*************************************

_______________________________________________
Prime mailing list
[email protected]
http://hogranch.com/mailman/listinfo/prime

Reply via email to