On Tuesday 07 November 2006 12:18, david eddy wrote:
> > Why "rare" instead of "optimal"?  Well, I don't want to be the one to
> > tell someone
> > he missed a prime because his run had a not-unexpected round off error.
>
> OTOH he (or she!) was more likely to miss finding a prime because excessive
> time was wasted using the larger FFT.

Umm. If you get the wrong residue you're wasting all your time. Also if you're 
cutting it too fine, you will start getting a significant rate of roundoff 
errors detected, which may be recovered but "waste" time re-computing from 
the last savefile. Implementing full roundoff error checking costs about the 
same in terms of time "wastage" as going to the next run length. In any case 
a detected roundoff error of 0.5 cannot be reliably recovered from as it's 
impossible to guess accurately whether the correct integer is the "floor" or 
the "ceiling".
>
> It amounts to paying unnecessarily high insurance.
> How about informing testers of exponents at the bottom of one of
> your ranges what the risk of using the smaller FFT is, and allowing
> them to take it if they want to?

It may be appear to be "optimal" to guess a residue and report that without 
bothering to run any of the test! After all there's a 1 in 2^64 chance you 
will get it right... The server wouldn't react well to this if everyone tried 
it, though.
>
> BTW I replaced Prime95v24.14 with v23.18 mid run, achieving a 14%
> speed up on my PII. Any danger I have sabotaged the test?

Should be OK, the most likely problem with a reverse upgrade is compatibility 
of the savefile.

There is however a problem with some exponents when switching between 
computers - even with the same software version. If you switch from a 
non-SSE2-capable processor type to a SSE2-capable processor type, and the 
exponent is between the SSE2 and non-SSE2 run length limits, you will almost 
certainly end up with excess roundoff errors, and very likely with a wrong 
residue - even if all the roundoff errors were apparently recovered.

Regards
Brian Beesley
_______________________________________________
Prime mailing list
[email protected]
http://hogranch.com/mailman/listinfo/prime

Reply via email to