George Woltman wrote: > There are many overclocked machines that produce reliable results. > A lot depends on how close-to-the-edge you push it and whether you > regularly check to make sure all is still well (changing seasons, dust > buildup, > aging parts can all turn a stable overclock into an unstable one). > There must be a point of diminishing returns in overclocking, where the errors it introduces ruin so many results it isn't worth it. Do you have an idea of where that is, or does it depend on many factors?
_______________________________________________ Prime mailing list [email protected] http://hogranch.com/mailman/listinfo/prime
