Your judicious selection of ranges biasses your
conclusions in favour of the spectacular.
> Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 15:01:48 -0400> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]> CC: [email protected]> Subject: Re: [Prime] Another Mersenne 
> Prime?!> > On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 9:35 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > How 
> does this relate to the expectation of 1.78 in a doubling range of exponent 
> and the "unusually fertile" stretch of exponents recently?> > 7 primes in an 
> area where we expected to find 2 -- certainly very lucky.> Of course, in the 
> 3.1M - 20M range we only found 2 when we expected 5.> 
> _______________________________________________> Prime mailing list> 
> [email protected]> http://hogranch.com/mailman/listinfo/prime
_________________________________________________________________
Get all your favourite content with the slick new MSN Toolbar - FREE
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/111354027/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Prime mailing list
[email protected]
http://hogranch.com/mailman/listinfo/prime

Reply via email to