Martin wrote:
> Mike McCarty wrote:
> [...]
>> The backup in question is one of DATA, not HARDWARE.
> [...]
>> In other words, cheap. Resourcefulness and ingenuity make up
>> for a large lack of funds in many endeavors...
>
>
> There is also the cost of /time/ ...
Of course.
> I too keep multiple backups, both onsite and offsite. That keeps the
> /data/ safe.
Also the programs, which to the backup are just more data. The
hardware currently running v5 could be running v4, true?
> The only /hardware/ that I keep as a 'backup' is for what is critical
> for my work. That costs time and money.
However, v5 is currently running on some hardware. Is there a
reason v4 could not be run on it?
[...]
> I guess all that is needed beyond that is a minor sorry for the minor
> disruption.
I haven't noticed any. I am running
$ ./mprime -v
Mersenne Prime Test Program, Version 24.14.2
and that's it. So far, it hasn't complained about inability
to connect to anything else.
[...]
> Progress often has a disruption and time cost.
PPPPPPP (pronounced like a "rasberry")
Prior Proper Planning Prevent Piss Poor Performance
> For an Amateur project, I think we've had a far better run than any of
> the 'professionals' could offer. And all for the love of the search and
> for minimal cost. Very good.
I'm still in.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN.
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
_______________________________________________
Prime mailing list
[email protected]
http://hogranch.com/mailman/listinfo/prime
