I work for a health plan in New Mexico.
 
We are finding a number of small providers (2-3 person offices) on our panel
who:

*       don't use the internet and 
*       don't conduct any transactions electronically;  
*       in addition they fall under the Medicare size exception for
electronic billing by 10/16/2003.

 
We are telling them:
1) they probably would not be considered a covered entity - but to check
with an attorney
2) HIPAA Privacy will probably become the community standard so to begin to
adopt what makes sense from those regulations.
 
Julie Fulcher 
HIPAA Project Manager 
Presbyterian Healthcare Services 
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87125-6666 
(505) 923-6397 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Rachel Foerster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 3:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: WEDI/SNIP MANAGEMENT! Non-compliance model




Tim,
 
On first blush, your idea seems to have merit. On a second read, however,
the only type of entity that has any wiggle room to not have the HIPAA law
and regs apply to it would be a health care provider. All other types of
covered entities are defined in the law/regs, i.e., health plans and
clearinghouses, and I haven't seen any wiggle room for that type of entity
at all.
 
Thus, for non-health care provider entity types, the only option would be
flagrant non-compliance with the law. Not a very viable option from a
risk/liability viewpoint.
 

Rachel Foerster
Principal
Rachel Foerster & Associates, Ltd.
39432 North Avenue
Beach Park, IL 60099
Voice: 847-872-8070
Fax: 847-872-6860
eMail:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rfa-edi.com

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 3:13 PM
To: Deborah Campbell; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: WEDI/SNIP MANAGEMENT! Non-compliance model


I think these thought processes are substantially flawed.  However, it
occurs to me that we are seeing a significant issue emerge that requires
addressing:  
 
What are the actual requirements for legal non-participation in HIPAA?  From
my perspective, I can not see how any modern practice can not engage in some
form of arguably covered transactions which trigger HIPAA covered entity or
business associate status.  Even if they sub-contract the transactions
services, they're still a covered entity per CMS/OCR.   And, as I have
stated before, I think the Privacy and Security Rules are generally a good
steps forward.
 
So, exactly what does a business have to give up to not be covered under
HIPAA?  What I am asking is: should SNIP develop a document that clearly
states what these requirements are?  Until such a document exists, business
people can not objectively evaluate non-applicability from non-compliance.
Nor can they look at the real loss of business that I believe such moves
would entail.
 
I, for one, would be very interested in participating is such a project.  I,
like many, have found it difficult to express to potential covered entities
what their options are in this regard.  So I believe that a
non-applicability implementation guide is ultimately the only way to resolve
this.  Or do we simply leave it up to OCR enforcement and case law to
determine this?
 


Tim McGuinness, Ph.D.

Consulting Specialist in Regulatory Privacy, Security, and Application
Compliance (HIPAA/ASCA/FDA/CMS-HCFA/ICH/ADA 508c), 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
 
President,
HIPAA Help Now
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
www.hipaahelpnow.com <http://www.hipaahelpnow.com/> 
 
Executive Co-Chairman for Privacy,
HIPAA Conformance Certification Organization (HCCO)
www.hipaacertification.org <http://www.hipaacertification.org> 


********************************************************************** 
To be removed from this list, go to:
http://snip.wedi.org/unsubscribe.cfm?list=privacy 
and enter your email address. 

The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The 
discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual

participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board
of 
Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post 
your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at 
http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/. 
Posting of advertisements or other commercial use of this listserv is 
specifically prohibited. 




--- PRESBYTERIAN HEALTHCARE SERVICES DISCLAIMER ---

This message originates from Presbyterian Healthcare Services or one of its affiliated 
organizations. It contains information, which may be confidential or privileged, and 
is intended only for the individual or entity named above. It is prohibited for anyone 
else to disclose, copy, distribute or use the contents of this message. All personal 
messages express views solely of the sender, which are not to be attributed to 
Presbyterian Healthcare Services or any of its affiliated organizations, and may not 
be distributed without this disclaimer. If you received this message in error, please 
notify us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

**********************************************************************
To be removed from this list, go to: http://snip.wedi.org/unsubscribe.cfm?list=privacy
and enter your email address.

The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated.  The
discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual
participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of
Directors nor WEDI SNIP.  If you wish to receive an official opinion, post
your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at
http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/.
Posting of advertisements or other commercial use of this listserv is
specifically prohibited.

Reply via email to