On 12/30/10 2:12 PM, Pascal Costanza wrote: > The solution I proposed last avoids that by having exactly one class > definition. However, such cases are unlikely to occur in practice, so > this is likely just an academic exercise. Nevertheless, I think it's > important to mention this I agree that mentioning this is a good idea. Part of the whole idea of the "pro" mailing list is to be a place where we can all share knowledge about the more complex/subtle issues in Common Lisp. Thanks for clearing this up!
-- Dan _______________________________________________ pro mailing list pro@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pro
