On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll <[email protected]> wrote: > I _now_ think that the compiler macro processor should simply recognize the > failure to parse the form and return the original form, unprocessed
I agree. Otherwise the compiler macro writer has to use &rest and parse the argument list themselves; what's the point of making them do that? -- Scott _______________________________________________ pro mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pro
