Nick Levine wrote: >> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Adrien_Pi=E9rard?= <axiopl...@gmail.com> >> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:22:30 +0900 >> Cc: Common Lisp pros <pro@common-lisp.net> >> >> Hi Didier, >> >> Isn't http://www.cliki.net/Common%20Lisp%20implementation sufficient? >> >> (I guess it's not, but it's a good start.) > > It doesn't mention the commercial lisps (ACL, LW, Scieneer). Dan > Weinreb's survey (referenced from the cliki page) is much better.
Yes, although a bit too verbose. Neither of them provide details on how to request interpretation / bytecomp or comp for implementations that provide several options. I guess what I'm looking for is more "cookbook" style. -- Resistance is futile. You will be jazzimilated. Scientific site: http://www.lrde.epita.fr/~didier Music (Jazz) site: http://www.didierverna.com _______________________________________________ pro mailing list pro@common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pro