On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 18:13:35 +0200, Pascal J. Bourguignon wrote: > a dead process sending fixed or previsible packets
I didn't think of that. So basically you ensure the responding connection isn't compromised by exercising the encryption, which is the hardest to fake for a malicious attacker. Makes sense... Shame on me! :) What about a fixed length input though (and maybe answering with a digest)? It still seems to me that the specified behavior is overly arbitrary/error prone. _______________________________________________ pro mailing list pro@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pro
