Hello CL Pros,

Lately I have been improving the MOPishness of MKCL and that brought me in
contact with the specification of intern-eql-specializer in AMOP.

The EQ requirement on its returned value seem to me to dictate a hash-table
implementation (PCL and its derivatives all seem to do just that).

The problem I see with this is that it will be a "for ever growing"
hash-table with not upper bound in sight. And the "purpose" of such a
mandatory built-in memory leak also completely escapes me. Could any of you
share some insight on this question, please?

Thank you,

JCB
_______________________________________________
pro mailing list
pro@common-lisp.net
http://mailman.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pro

Reply via email to