On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Kenneth Tilton <k...@tiltontec.com> wrote: > EQ, as you adroitly demonstrated, worries about all sorts of things, > including a symbol's package.
Which is part of what has me confused. Up until now I would have said that the "problem" of EQ is that it doesn't worry about _enough_ things. (EQ 3/4 3/4) is NIL because EQ doesn't bother to look "into" the numbers (as EQL does) but just superficially checks their "pointer identity". And for symbols that's not the case? Hmmm...
