Ah, but the OP specified "built-in" along with "non-standard".
hth -hk On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Sam Steingold <[email protected]> wrote: > > * Didier Verna <[email protected]> [2017-05-17 17:33:40 +0200]: > > > > Does anyone know why the non-standard built-in method combinations do > > not support before and after methods? > > If you are defining the method combination, you have way more freedom > and flexibility than mere before and after. > Basically, you can do it yourself. > > -- > Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on darwin Ns 10.3.1504 > http://steingoldpsychology.com http://www.childpsy.net > https://ffii.org http://camera.org http://think-israel.org > http://no2bds.org > Do not worry about which side your bread is buttered on: you eat BOTH > sides. > > -- *Ken **Tilton *|Software Engineer *w:* (555) 555-5555 *e:* [email protected] <http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps>
