Thanks for the update. 

I wanted to access ILC content. Any chance of getting that up and running again?

- nick

> On 11 Oct 2017, at 22:44, Dave Cooper <david.coo...@genworks.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Nick,
>  
> The ALU still exists, and I am still a board member, although not an officer. 
> Rusty is continuing to keep the offiicial Corporation documents up to date 
> with the state of Virginia, etc. 
> 
> The CLF had offered several months ago to provide hosting services for the 
> ALU web properties (at reasonable out-of-pocket cost), but the ALU has yet to 
> follow up with a specific green light to do that or content to host. 
> 
> Robert Smith, current official ALU president, had to cancel the last several 
> scheduled monthly ALU meetings due to a busy travel schedule (a couple times 
> he was on airplanes at the time of the meetings).  Last week, he had to 
> cancel our meeting again, and also sent a note inviting someone else to take 
> over the role of president.  He didn't officially resign, but acknowledged 
> the fact that his several attempts to get the ball rolling on the next ILC 
> have not gotten much traction.  If you'd like, I can ask Robert to forward 
> that note to this list. 
> 
> So that's what I know right now.  
> 
> So far I haven't seen any responses to his email on the ALU lists (which I 
> think are manually maintained as CC lists right now).   I'm not sure what the 
> next steps should be or by whom, but at least I wanted to pass on the small 
> amount of news which I know. 
> 
> Regards,
> 
>  Dave
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Nick Levine <n...@nicklevine.org> wrote:
>> Writing to who @alu.org?
>> 
>> Is anyone from the ALU listening? Does it still exist?
>> 
>> - nick
>> 
>> > On 11 Oct 2017, at 19:58, Matthew Mondor <mm_li...@pulsar-zone.net> wrote:
>> > Have you already tried email?  Because it may work (SMTP servers are
>> > responding):
>> >
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> My Best,
> 
> Dave Cooper, david.cooper@gen.works
> genworks.com, gendl.org
> +1 248-330-2979
> 

Reply via email to