On 15 December 2017 at 01:26, Faré <fah...@gmail.com> wrote: > In addition to > http://www.cliki.net/CLHS%20Errata > Don't forget this page: > http://www.cliki.net/Proposed%20ANSI%20Revisions%20and%20Clarifications
Actually, I created "CLHS Errata" today by copying the contents of the section "Minor corrections to CLHS (errata)" in "Proposed ANSI Revisions and Clarifications" and re-organizing them a bit. I now see that the section "Clarifications to the current standard" under the latter page also contains some actual erratum, for example, Issue ERROR-EXAMPLE: Correct the invalid IF form in the (informational) wargames:no-win-scenario example for ERROR. I can move all errata under this section too to the "CLHS Errata" page and let only proposals/clarifications remain on the other one, if people think it makes sense. Chaitanya > > —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org > Richman's Law: No matter how much the government controls the economic system, > any problem will be blamed on whatever small zone of freedom that remains. > — Sheldon Richman > > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 1:24 PM, Chaitanya Gupta > <m...@chaitanyagupta.com> wrote: >> On 14 December 2017 at 23:27, Steve Haflich <shafl...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Just keep in mind that some of the items on the CLiki list propose changes >>> (divergences from) current normative ANSI CL requirements, and that others >>> are simply drafted sloppily. These changes would not have automatically >>> passed review under the original X3J13 process, and no one should assume >>> their long life on the CLiki page means they would be uncontroversial. >> >> Yes, and the actual errata was listed at the bottom of that page. >> >> I took all of them and set up a new page, organized by chapter and >> with proper links: >> >> http://www.cliki.net/CLHS%20Errata >> >> If the community feels this is fine, I will remove the errata section >> from the earlier page and link to this one instead. >> >> Chaitanya >> >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 4:04 AM, Don Morrison <d...@cmu.edu> wrote: >>>> >>>> When I reported an error I’d noticed in the HyperSpec to Lispworks three >>>> years ago their response pointed me at the CLiki page, so I suspect that is >>>> probably the best source of errata available. And, more importantly, that >>>> response seems to imply they have no interest in updating the HyperSpec. >>>> That said, I remain grateful to them that it is available, even in its >>>> ossified form. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Don Morrison <d...@cmu.edu> >>>> “We are not an endangered species ourselves yet, but this >>>> is not for lack of trying.” >>>> — Douglas Adams, /Last Chance to See/ >>>> >>> >> > -- https://chaitanyagupta.com https://lisper.in https://twitter.com/chaitanya_gupta