There’s cl-ana, which may be a useful substitute in some cases… or april, possibly.
https://www.cliki.net/cl-ana https://www.cliki.net/april If you specifically want numpy, it may be possible to have Common Lisp talking to python. > On 11 Apr 2023, at 08:41, Marco Antoniotti <marco.antonio...@unimib.it> wrote: > > Hi Michael > > I am all for it. But, as I said, I am an academic (and a cat). > > Should we (as in "a bunch of common lispers", most of whom with day jobs) > want to do something like that, how would you want to proceed? Note that I > have been part of many past failures. > > All the best > > Marco > > > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 1:01 AM Michael Bentley <mich...@stray-labs.com > <mailto:mich...@stray-labs.com>> wrote: >> >>> IMHO, it'd be easier and effective to band up together and FIRST write a >>> proper API specification and THEN implement it in CL. >> >> I agree. Here’s the API specification for NumPy: >> https://numpy.org/doc/stable/reference/index.html#reference >> >> Looks rather intimidating. Less intimidating though, than doing the FFI >> dance, though.