Sorry Stelian, but that begs the question a bit. Why using CL when using GO solves the problem?
Marco Antoniotti https://dcb.disco.unimib.it On Thu, 18 Dec 2025 at 01:56, Stelian Ionescu <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Steve > > I understand that, and I know about the idiosyncrasies of the bulk > operations under different implementations. > I am asking what would be the best way to, say, implement a > READ-SEQ-NO-HANG (for want of a better name) using USOCKET provided > primitives; yes I am working with sockets. > Reading a byte at a time and listening would work? Any better ideas? > I am fooling around as we speak. Any suggestion will be welcome; the only > constraint: using USOCKET. > Cheers > > > Why does it have to be Usocket ? You'd solve this problem by just using > HTTP. > > -- > Stelian Ionescu > >
