Yes, I was trying to understand this topic as well. Obviously pro-audio is not in breach of any copyright unless some upstream developer has stolen code (again very unlikely).. However I am completely against government monitoring and am a strong supporter (including some financial support) of the "No Clean Feed" campaign here in Australia. I was of the understanding that the HADOPI laws were squashed by the EU, if not then I agree, pro-audio should seek another host...
cheers Allan On Wed Apr 1 23:55 , Damien Moody sent: >Man, I am SO out of touch with society's little cultural artifacts (and >don't really care that I'm so out of touch), that I'd paid no heed to >the date. > >*as Kelso from That 70's Show* Burn! Burrrrn! > >------------------------------------------------------------ >If voting could really change things, it would be illegal. > > > >Xavier Miller wrote: >> MWAHAHAHA ! >> 1st of April ;) >> >> Damien Moody a écrit : >>> I just got an email from Tuxfamily to the effect that Tuxfamily >>> whole-heartedly endorses HADOPI, which, as far as I can figure out from >>> the unclear and indirect information provided on the net, is a new law >>> that bars people from the internet if they download pirated material. >>> >>> If that's what it is, what is the reaction from folks on pro-audio? I am >>> extremely against any reason for government to monitor and spy on people >>> for ANY reason. If you got probable cause, move in. If not, butt out. >>> >>> I would also like to propose, since Tuxfamily apparently intends to spy >>> on its users now, that the pro-audio project seek to be hosted >>> elsewhere. >>> >> >> >> >> > > >)
