Il giorno mer, 23/03/2011 alle 16.18 -0700, siris ha scritto:
> What are the advantages of using jack on dbus rather than the classing
> jackd?
>
> Several times I've gotten frustrated with the dbus version, since it
> either was not starting, kept crashing, or requiring a system reboot
> rather than restarting dbus or jack when the server crashed. Has anyone
> else experienced this?
if you use a session manager like LADISH http://ladish.org/ then the
D-Bus bindings of JACK are required. i find LADISH and JACK D-Bus to be
as stable as classic JACK with QjackCtl, and LADISH provides a nice
session management.
peace, w
>
> On 3/23/2011 6:19 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 2:36 AM, "Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)"
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> hi,
> >>
> >> you have to enable 'classic' use flag to have jackd installed. by
> >> default it installs just dbus support iirc.
> >>
> >> miroslav
> >>
> > Thanks. That solved the first problem.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Mark
> >
> >
>
>
--
http://wayne.in-giro.org
