On Monday 11 March 2013 17:33:31 Dominique Michel wrote: > Same problem with libclam. Also, I don't know if <libclam-9999 still > work because I get blocking that I don't want to solve if I try to > install one of them. The easier solution here would be to keep only the > live versions of the CLAM ebuilds. Any objection?
I'm working on libclam-1.4.0-r1 at the moment, not sure how long it will take or if i can eventually build it. just patched it for gcc4.6 but needs big tidy up by converting to scons-utils, fixing failing multilib-strict and not respecting LDFLAGS. Cheers Gav
