I currently use Pro Tools with the the 002.  This provides some level of
accessibility to mute, solo, volume, pan, selecting tracks, selecting
portions of audio and playback controls.  
Probably the most important function that is not accessible is the setting
of track inputs and outputs.  I also find that many of the option dialogue
boxes such as tempo, quantize, importing audio etc... Don't work well with
Voice Over.
  
Best,
Tim
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 9:00 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: ProAudio Digest, Vol 23, Issue 2

Send ProAudio mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        
http://macvisionaries.com/mailman/listinfo/proaudio_macvisionaries.com

or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of ProAudio digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. trying this again (Tracy Son)
   2. updates on Pro Tools (Tracy Son)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 13:09:32 -0600
From: "Tracy Son" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: trying this again
To: "Discussions on the use of VoiceOver in professional
        audioenvironments"      <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="iso-8859-1"

Hello.
This is in regard to an earlyer post just posted in the last 2 days.
I to, have the same questions about that same program as well as pro tools
from Degidesign.
I some how am wondering if Degidesign didn't just give us some kind of beat
around the bush answer hoping we, the blind would go away.
So much of the time this is what developers do.
So much for our dreams and hopes.
 I am not a programmer but it can't be that hard to redesign the front end
of a program and make the buttons and volume controls accessable.
I am not saying by any means that it would be easy but it can't be that much
harder in a programming language to do that than anything else the
programmers might do.
Tracy Son.


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 18:45:40 -0600
From: "Tracy Son" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: updates on Pro Tools
To: "Discussions on the use of VoiceOver in professional
        audioenvironments"      <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="iso-8859-1"

Hello to the list.
On the petition page for Pro Tools accessibility there is the spring update.
Does anyone know for sure if dialog is going on with Pro Tools about this
problem of accessibility?
Is there a possibility of another progress report soon.
Just anything to let people know they are moving in a positive direction.
I know things are slow but I some times just wonder if we just got the run
around like most of the time the blind community gets.
Tracy Son.


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
ProAudio mailing list
[email protected]
http://macvisionaries.com/mailman/listinfo/proaudio_macvisionaries.com


End of ProAudio Digest, Vol 23, Issue 2
***************************************



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.13/1213 - Release Date: 1/7/2008
9:14 AM



_______________________________________________
ProAudio mailing list
[email protected]
http://macvisionaries.com/mailman/listinfo/proaudio_macvisionaries.com

Reply via email to