on 13/2/04 1:42 pm, fIvaldi wrote: > Have a look on the test from Rob Galbraith on dpreview, and > luminuslandscape too. The 14n is quoted far better than the 1Ds, in > sunny light; but far worst in twilight, or overcast. > Now the picts on the WS are *all* daylight... Be cautious before taking > a decision.
The sample file 'Church 14MP'on the kodak site looks very good. To my eye there is much less noise in the shadows than I would have expected from a 14n file. I could not see much info in the file's EXIF information so can not tell what lens or exposure was used. It also looks to me like a mixed light shot, some flash on the alter mixed with the ambient. As a sample it is streets ahead of the first portrait samples that came out from the 14n. In fact after looking at all the samlples posted, and having tested the 14n. I have put my name on a waiting list at a London dealer, and also asked to see a demo model as soon as one is available. Obviously with no obligation. I would go as far as to say I am hopeful about the camera. Time will tell. Ian -- Ian Goodrick, Tel/Fax +44 (0) 1474 333066 Ian Goodrick Photography, Mobile 07860 362322 Gravesend, Kent, UK www.goodrick-photo.com =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
