On 9/11/2004 3:19 pm, "Richard Earney" wrote: Richard,
You misread my posting... > The Lyson Fotonic inksets work a treat and their dye-based inks last an > awfully long time. Nothing wrong with Lyson ink... But why pay the premium for an Epson 2100 printer which uses the Ultrachrome inkset (some say better longevity than Lyson Fotonic) just to use it with Lyson Inks. Better to buy the Epson 1290s (dye based printer) which is GBP 200 less than the 2100 and use that with Lyson Fotonics. > Plus there is now the Lyson PhotoChrome inkset - offering pigment inks > in a CIS. This is an interesting point... There is no information on how the Lyson PhotoChrome inkset compares to the Epson Ultrachrome inkset. Sure, savings due to the CIS could be substantial, but I have not found anyone who is using the Lyson PhotoChrome inkset as opposed to the Epson Ultrachrome. Hope that sets the record straight, Michael =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
