I knew Michael was into this sort of thing... LOL

On 6/13/06, Bill Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

"PORNOGRAPHY is difficult to define, wrote Justice Potter Stewart, "but
I know it when I see it."

That famously commonsensical line would seem to obviate the need for any
deeper analysis of the egregious Ann Coulter. Like most pornographers,
however, she is resourceful in the service of her own economic and other
interests. That makes it hard to do what most sensible people do when
confronted with obscenity, which is look away.

At the moment, Coulter is out pimping her latest book and, this week,
she was definitely in your face."

"If you've ever encountered Coulter on television or glanced at one of
her book covers — all of which feature a "glamour shot" photo — you've
probably noticed that she's inevitably dressed in an improbably short
and low-cut black dress. At a gaunt 45 years of age, you might think the
ingénue with fangs shtick would be wearing rather thin. Still, it's
always been true that a certain segment of pornography consumers derive
an erotic charge from the trappings of hate. Black leather and relic
Nazi paraphernalia, for example, have a kind of iconic status in the
sadomasochistic subcultures inclined toward fetishism.

That probably explains the "not all" among O'Reilly's generally outraged
conservatives. As Justice Stewart said, you know it when you see it.

What that doesn't explain is why reputable media organizations such as
Random House, which published Coulter's book, and NBC, which helped her
publicize it, think it's OK to make a buck peddling porn."

<http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/la-et-rutten10jun10,1,569325.column?ctrack=1&cset=true>



[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to