<< Jeez Dominic do I have to spell it out? Now who's getting all shrill ;-)
Bob, as I said, I *do* get your point, but I just think in this instance it was cheap. Regards Dominic Burford BSc Hons MBCS CITP Third Party Developer Program Senior Software Engineer * Tel: +44 (0) 1536 495074 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] "I conclude that there are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies." -- Tony Hoare, Turing Award Lecture 1980 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Calco Sent: 20 June 2006 11:55 To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: [OT] Images of war ! << The analogy to indoor plumbing isn't entirely glib ! ! Of course it is. How can you possibly compare indoor plumbing to war? Jeez Dominic do I have to spell it out? Because we are not 'making war' for the sake of killing people so that we can have more misery and death captured on gruesome photographs, as Ed crudely claims. He is appealing to emotion---the natural human reaction to seeing the images---and impugning motives (as if to say, see what monsters they are, the people who support this policy) in order to set up an unsound syllogism---"To be for the policy of liberating Iraq from the terrorists and thugs you must be for babies getting killed and families torn apart. Since no human can possibly be for that (just look at the gruesome images and ask your own heart!), people who support the policy must be inhumane." He was analogously saying that people who ostensibly advocate something positive (say, indoor plumbing) REALLY advocate its dark side (more stink and sewage). ! To my knowledge, indoor plumbing has never killed anyone, or ! resulted in ! civil war. How many women and children have been killed from indoor ! plumbing? I think you have over stepped the mark in bad ! taste here Bob. I think I was using the analogy to illustrate the absurdity of Ed's renowned and esteemed logic. Ed was the one IMHO who stepped over the line. I don't advocate hiding the images and the reality of war's dark side, but I also think the desire to use them in the way Ed and then Dave Crozier advocates is simply because they know the images can be used to cloud logic with emotion to the benefit of their policy position. Fine propagandize all you want with the images (people use this tactic all the time, regardless of political persuasion)---not even knowing (as the author of the article admitted he didn't know) when or how most of the images came about. The implication was that they were all victims of American bombing, but in case you didn't notice most of the bombs in the last three years have been going off because Iraqi reactionaries and foreign terrorists have been engaged in a campaign to produce as many of those pictures as they can in order to weaken our resolve to defeat them and reassert authoritarian control over the Iraqi population _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
