It is wried. I don't think we can take it out on the launchpad, I think we have to wait until it goes over Japan, or is headed to the US.
Apparently the last one they fired actually broke up over Alaska --- Leland Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is kind of wried, because under normal rules of international > diplomacy, let's call it being a good international neighbor, one > country would not have the right to impose its will on another country, > regarding what the country could build, or what the country could test. > To pre-emptively take out a North Korean test missile would be an act of > war in anybody book, just like the sinking of a ship in internal waters > by a submarine would be an act of war. Is it possible that North Korea > could test her missile without violating the air space of any other country? > > Based on internal law, nobody owns outer space, any more than anyone > owns the air we breath, so unless North Korea commits some clear act of > aggression against the US, she would have a right to test missiles, just > like any other country, including the US, France, Russia, India, > Pakistan, China, Japan, England, German, etc. I don't know where this > neocon idea of pre-emptive attack comes from, and why the neocon think > they have the power to know, and thus somehow shape the future for > better or worse. I think that is terrible self centered and arrogant. > > I'm not even sure that standing down the North Koreans, now, over firing > a test missile, would be a win for the US. Missiles can be easily > hidden, both underground in missile silos and undersea in submarines. > At least in this present situation with North Korea ,we know that a > missile may be fired as a test, reducing the chance that an accidental > nuclear exchange between countries with more advanced systems might > occur. Remember, their is alway a threat that a third party could > explode a nuclear device against a country, and make it appear that some > enemy of the third party was the perpetrator. In this way the thrid > party could score a win by pitting two superior power against each other > in a mutual destruction senario. > > Regards, > > LelandJ > > > hem good neighbor > > Michael Madigan wrote: > > >HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH Walter Mondale is calling for an attack on North Korea? > >This dildo didn't > >attack Iran when they took 52 hostages, and he wants us to attack a Nuclear > >North Korea? > > > >http://www.kare11.com/news/news_article.aspx?storyid=127766 > > > >What a set of balls. > > > >**** New Lower Prices ***** > >Horse Racing Photos at http://michaelmadigan.exposuremanager.com/ > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
