It wasn't my question.

And what you describe is true enough, but irrelevant to the discussion of
allowing execution under various versions of the .Net Framework.  We're not
talking about the version of the assembly, but rather the restrictions the
assembly makes (or can make) as to what version(s) of the .Net Framework
under which it many run.

Hank

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Stephen the Cook
Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 10:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: VFP Com Interop with .NET (revisited)

Hank Fay <> wrote:
> Aside from the difference in getting the CLR version installed
> (20-40meg vs. 5 meg), and the lack of backward compatibility, .Net
> also gives developers the ability to _turn off_ backward
> compatibility, which appears to be what happened here.  
> 
> To claim, with an exclamation regarding the presence of bovine
> excrement, that there is no difference, disregards the obvious,
> important, and noxious differences.  
> 
> BTW: it's not a VS2005 vs. VS2003 difference, really.  It's about the
> .Net version (which can be accessed independently of VSxxxx, q.v.
> ReSharper, Notepad, etc.)  

Ok, lets cut through some FUD.  

Yes you can reference the assembly by its strong name.  
Strong-named assemblies consist of the assembly's identity:
1.- The simple text name of the assembly.
2.- The version number of the assembly.
3.- The culture information, if it is provided (optional).
4.- A public key for the client.
5.- A digital signature.

So were there multiple versions in your GAC?  I am guessing that your
attempting to use one from VFP and the other is rearing it's ugly self?
It's not working properly and the whole process is hitting the bit bucket?
But then I really don't remember what your issue was in the beginning.  So
what I have said may have no real value?  Sorry.


Stephen Russell
DBA / Operations Developer

Memphis TN 38115
901.246-0159

http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.3/374 - Release Date: 6/23/2006
 



[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to