Ditto that,
All the XP machines I use I switch back to "Classic" view... it's much more practical from a developers point of view... I don't like 'wizards' or anything else where MS tries to guess what I want to do... or hide what it thinks I don't need to see... I like full control.

Philip


Ed Leafe wrote:

On Jul 10, 2006, at 2:24 PM, Alan Bourke wrote:

Um ... the way Windows works has been pretty much the same through
NT/2000/XP/2003 - apart from certain configuration things being moved.


Sorry, but I had lots of clients who had a hard time adjusting to XP. The file explorer windows were completely new, as well as the Start menu: the two OS features users interact with the most. Many simply switched back to the 2000 interface once we showed them how and stayed with it. If XP were an 'improvement', they sure didn't think so.

So your Mac GUI looks like OS 9 does it :) ??


    No, but OS 9 looks like OS 8, which looked like OS 7...

You forget that OS X is a completely new OS; it's comparable to the switch from DOS to Win95. Yet I don't think that the visuals differences are anywhere near as dramatic as *that* change!

And among OS X versions over the last 6 years, Tiger looks like Panther, which looked like Jaguar, which looked like Puma, which looked like Cheetah. What distinguished each of these releases is that the underlying OS became faster and more efficient, and added more useful features that you could access in the same way you always have. What most people who are used to Windows usually can't believe is that with each new release, the hardware requirements actually *go down*, because the OS is more efficient.

-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com





[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to