I don't think you can use SQL Server views in this manner. If you have quite a few parameters pass them in as xml. I haven't done much work with xml in VFP, but SQL server handles XML quite nicely, especially if it's SQL Server 2005.
Thanks, Nick Cipollina -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Babcock Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 4:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [NF] Views in SQL Server Nick Cipollina wrote: > I'm actually in the process of doing the same thing. We have a legacy > FoxPro application and all of the data is currently in VFP free tables. > I am going to start moving the data to SQL Server. I have chosen the > approach of using SQL stored procs with T-SQL commands to do all > querying, updating, etc... For what you are doing, I think stored procs > are definitely the way to go. > > Thanks, > > Nick Cipollina > But say you've got a table with many columns....won't that be a royal PITA to pass all of those columns as parms to a stored proc that updates the specific row? Wouldn't the use of a view get around this pain? --Michael [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
