Bill Arnold wrote:
The neocons knew all along
<snip> Hi Bill!
Start your post off name-calling, as usual. If that isn't "reasonable" I don't know what is.
The minute we can no longer access the Internet anonymously, it's power is drained. Does this have to be explained?
Explain how anonymity can be at all, even a little bit, helpful. If you don't have the guts to say "Bill Arnold" wrote this I might think that someone else did. How often do YOU post anonymous messages on the web, anyway? To put it another way, some MALE convicted child molester puts up a website claiming he is Paris Hilton and "she" wants to audition children and young teens for a part in "her" new movie at a motel in the next town. Anonymity IS helpful in this, maybe this is what you really want to do? That or deal pot, you have a history of that do you not? Biometric signatures on internet communication, the sooner the better. I understand the fingerprint reader is already available, perhaps the iris reader as well. If you aren't doing anything wrong you have nothing to worry about by properly identifying your messages. Regards, Pete _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
