You're even out of step with your own folks on this one. It was the
Radical Religious Right who were up in arms over this ridiculous choice
to the Supreme Court. Harriet Miers was a very good corporate, contract
attorney, but had no qualifications or experience what-so-ever in the
area of Constitutional Law. Her main qualifications, that made her an
appealing nomination to the Bush Administration, was her "Born again
Christian" credentials, coupled with a close relationship with George W.
Bush as his personal counsel. LOL
Regards,
LelandJ
petetheisen wrote:
Leland Jackson wrote:
I remember Senator Lieberman best as one of the 7 Democratic
centrist, who joined with 7 Republican centrist, to prevent Senator
Frist from abolishing the filibuster, which would have allow
president Bush to more easily pack the court with Judges who were
less than qualified for the Supreme Court, like his own personal
councel, Harriet Miers, for Chirt's sake. LOL. I respect Senator
Lieberman for his stand to protect the Senate filibuster, but now
Senator Lieberman should throw his support behind Ned Lamont who won
the Democratic primary. Instead, Senator Lieberman is planning on
running as an independent. This could split the Democratic vote and
allow a Neo-Conservative Bush Republican to win the Senate seat.
Hi Leland!
Chirt is going to get you. I think Harriet Miers would be a wonderful
supreme court justice.
Regards,
Pete
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
