Ed,
That’s EXACTLY what I want to do in my Factory and for the life of me I
can't find any documentation or examples on it. All the examples assume
object to have a pre-defined set of properties or to be subclassed in a
fixed way which is not very useful in my case as I only want to carry
certain properties with my objects that can be variable in number and type!.

I know I can do it ias weasy in Python as in VFP but .NET???....the search
goes on!

I don’t need methods (yet) but that would be really nice - even in VFP
without all the messing around to accomplish it.

Damn, more browsing for the answer methinks! 


Dave Crozier
 The secret to staying young is to live honestly, eat slowly, and to lie
about your age 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ed Leafe
Sent: 05 September 2006 16:13
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [NF] .NET AddProperty() Equivalent

On Sep 5, 2006, at 11:08 AM, Dave Crozier wrote:

> Anyone out there know af the .NET Equivalent of VFP's AddProperty ()? 
> I am just into developing a C# App which needt to create dynamic 
> properties. I initially used an 2D array holding the property name and 
> value but I'd really like to be able to create named properties on the 
> fly as per VFP and can't seem to find any reference to this within the 
> C# language.

        That's one of the cool things about Python: you can add attributes
of an object on the fly, including methods! Makes factory operations much
simpler: you can have a single class, and attach the behaviors you want in
the factory.

-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com





[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to