> Yup, he didn't come over as smug or arrogant. My opinion is > not clouded by any preconceptions. You seem to dislike him > anyway, so I assume your opinion is based more on that, than > anyting he actually said.
When Clinton was first elected, I thought he was going to be laughed out of office over his sex antics. Given the media's obsession with anything "sex" and his own history, it seemed he was dead meat out of the gate, and ... But now I look at him and see an older man who has been through some fires, has survived, and if he has managed to control his demons, it's possible he's ready for prime time. He was always very smart, nobody questioned that, but he had a gaping hole in the wisdom dept. I'm not going to rush to judgment, but I will listen to what else he has to say. That he showed disdain for Murdoch's Fox "news" was quite heartening, and a surprise, actually, because I had read somewhere that Hillary was hooked up with Murdoch, which caused me to write her - and him - off as useless. Maybe I'm reading too much into this one event, but if that was a shot across the neocon ship's bow, I definitely want to see the next round. Bill > Regards > > Dominic Burford BSc (Hons) MBCS CITP | Senior Software _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
