On 8/22/11 12:08 PM, Michael Oke, II wrote: > I have to agree. Given the choice, I will send plain text emails. Sometimes > tho, the person signing the checks wants it done differently and we have > little choice but to accommodate.
I feel like, if the decision maker still wants to do it wrong after I've tried my best to explain why it is a bad idea, then I'm not doing my job effectively and therefore need to step away. Either that, or their arguments convince me to change my stance, or we come to a compromise. Convincing them that "pretty emails" isn't a good idea is as simple as making one, and then showing them how awful it looks and how slowly it loads on a mobile device. Paul _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4e52aa9f.8000...@ulmcnett.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
