On 10/27/11 09:03, Ed Leafe wrote:
>       Looks like a fairly even-handed criticism of various mis-steps Redmond 
> has made since releasing XP. Do you agree with these? Or can you think of 
> more deserving actions?
>
> http://www.zdnet.com/photos/a-decades-worth-of-windows-mistakes-that-changed-microsoft-for-better-and-worse/6321552
>
> ( -or- http://j.mp/vpLzky )

I think it's a good article - rings true to me.  IMO, the most costly 
goof was Active-X, which was the first implementation of "We can run 
anything from anywhere and you won't even know it", and was at the root 
of the security problems.

There were several of these "Look what we can do!" announcements, which 
were designed to wow conference attendees with absolutely no attention 
to possible vulnerabilities.

I would add another item: the constant re-naming and re-organizing of 
system and user folders.  "Let's see, is this the one with My Network 
Places, or is it just Network?"

Dan Covill
San Diego

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to