On 10/13/06, Michael Hawksworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is MAPI and then there is well MAPI. For example MS was getting
fed up with people being able to use the normal mapi files that worked
in 98 so when XP came out they 'Made it better and more compatible with
Exchange'. Thus there MAPI integration no longer worked with anything
else and you had to load the MAPI module onto XP to run GroupWise and
L.Notes (originally separately now they have it as part of the install).
This is why I have a wrapper for the GW routines as then you dont have
to care which version of MAPI you faced in that environment.
Life would be boring if a standard was, well standard.
MAPI has always been a PITA. To be honest you're probably better off
using SMTP.
--
Paul
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
