On 2/9/2012 12:29 PM, Stephen Russell wrote: > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:45 AM, john harvey<john.har...@shelbynet.com> > wrote: >> I think we expect more out of it because it is a PRODUCTION car. If they are >> selling it, it should perform. Otherwise, it is a test vehicle. > ---------------- > > The time it takes to get a car rolled out use to be 5 years. Not sure > how much time they reduced it to lately. That time frame was from 85 > and the Phoenix text center. > > The past 4-5 years for GM have not been the best. So this is a > Windows 3.0 product in my mind. It works but it is kind of sucky. As > they get a lot of real users and conditions to really stress test this > the improvements will be made. > > All of our software is done in the same manner right? We get you a > shell that works. As users attempt to utilize it specifications that > were either discounted for cost or time will now be re-evaluated.
"Spoken like a true 'Softie fanboi." <gd&r> -- Mike Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC President, Chief Software Architect http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com http://twitter.com/mbabcock16 _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f343d0e.6010...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
