Oh I think Ed has done plenty of Fox based work over his lifetime.   Lol

The fact that he may not be doing any Fox development work at this time is 
(IMHO) not relevant.    Many of us on this list aren't working with the Fox 
anymore, or are doing it on a limited basis.  Come to think of it I don't think 
I even have VFP installed on any of my personal machines (maybe on a VM on my 
notebook, have to check).  I do have it installed on machine at work to support 
of a couple of legacy apps, but everything we have done in the last 2 years is 
in .NET.

YMMV, but Ed gets my vote.   Not that I have one, but if I did...

LS



-----Original Message-----
From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On 
Behalf Of Stephen Russell
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 7:22 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: 2012 FoxPro Lifetime Achievement Award Committee

On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:25 AM, John Weller <j...@johnweller.co.uk> wrote:
> I support that wholeheartedly!!!


Don't you think you should be doing fox based work to get the award?


-- 
Stephen Russell

901.246-0159 cell

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/0bac2c1927422843b2c121c8b41684af1e715...@dfw1mbx24.mex07a.mlsrvr.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to