=> Look at text you quoted from Ken. How much is => needed to understand the context of your reply? Do you => need tell us what you quoted is the "Original => Message"? Does the header information enable anyone to understand your reply better? => => All you need to quote is what you are replying to. => Outlook has no way of knowing this, so it just quotes the => entire thing. It is up to you to => delete the crap that Outlook dumps. => => -- Ed Leafe
Thanks, Ed. I needed that. HALinNY P.S. I already reduced your response to the pith level in case you decide to respond to this post. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
