Here in London I have waited 2 minutes at most. Walk in, hand card to staff, confirm name & address, walk to booth and tick a few boxes.
Most schools here are used for voting (they are closed for the day) I've never needed to walk more than half a mile (but I'm a city dweller). On 9 November 2012 20:31, geoff <data...@adam.com.au> wrote: > I live in australia. We would be unlucky to queue 30 minutes to vote. We > know how many people are going to vote so we staff the polling booths > accordingly. I struggle to understand how such a simple supply and demand > equation can so elude so many american voting authorities. Mind you we have > ONE electoral authority while I am guessing you have somewhere between 50 > and 200? A bit like you have 7000 police forces and we have 7. > > -----Original Message----- > From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of lelandj > Sent: Saturday, 10 November 2012 12:38 AM > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: Re: [OT] Florida's voting system sucks > > On 11/09/2012 06:10 AM, geoff wrote: > > They were hanging back from counting in case florida went down to the > > wire and they could cheat... again. > > > > And think about it... doesnt that just have that delicious taste of > > truth about it? > > The Florida voting process seemed to deliberately be trying to suppress the > vote by making the process inefficient, resulting in long lines that could > take up to seven or eight hours to reach the voting booth. LOL > > Regards, > > LelandJ > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of lelandj > > Sent: Friday, 9 November 2012 6:23 PM > > To: ProFox Email List > > Subject: Re: [OT] Florida's voting system sucks > > > > On 11/09/2012 01:37 AM, Pete Theisen wrote: > >> On 11/09/2012 02:30 AM, lelandj wrote: > >> > >>>>> Pete, can't Florida get her voting system together? LOL > >>>>> > >>>>> I'm glad the election didn't come down to Florida's 29 electoral > >>>>> votes; because, I'm pretty sure the Republican controlled state > >>>>> would have followed along the lines of the 2000 election that put > >>>>> GWB in office. > >>>>> > >>>>> Finally; three hours ago: > >>>>> > >>>>> http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/2012/results > >>>> What would Texas have done, given that close a result? > >>> Perhaps the Florida officials responsible for running the elections > >>> should consult with an expert on the subject to find opportunities > >>> how the Florida voting system might be improved. I'm sure there are > >>> some fine experts, as the other 49 states, including NY and NJ, that > >>> were ravaged by hurricane Sandy, got it right. > >> Ducked the question, as usual. You don't know about your own state, > >> do you. > > What does the election being close have to do with how long it take to > > count the votes? LOL It should only delay calling the election by > > projection, until all votes are counted, which should have occurred > > election night. No recount was involved. > > > > Regards, > > > > LelandJ > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cadwx0++m932gcevn_p97a1n2nqfpwv2pfgzqigrcrnavrgp...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
