Ed,
 
I agree with you with regard to new apps.  My arguments go to a percentage of 
existing apps where there is no good business argument to be made to change 
languages now.
 
We do conversions to .NET and, in a limited number  of cases, to Microsoft 
Access with a SQL backend.
 
With regard to learning new skills,  agree  100%.
 
Wes

Wes Wilson, President  
ERW Custom Programming, Inc. 
Crescent Lake Plaza
5459  Elizabeth Lake Rd.
Waterford, MI 48327 
(248) 683-4182  
http://www.erw.com/

weswil...@erw.com

www.visualfoxprohelpwanted.com/VFPHelpWantedShortForm.php

 

________________________________
 From: "profox-requ...@leafe.com" <profox-requ...@leafe.com>
To: profox@leafe.com 
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 11:56 AM
Subject: ProFox Digest, Vol 115, Issue 44
  
----- Forwarded Message -----

Send ProFox mailing list submissions to
    profox@leafe.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    profox-requ...@leafe.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
    profox-ow...@leafe.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of ProFox digest..."

Today's Topics:

   1. RE: SHA256 hash WITHOUT using VFPEncryption.FLL (Paul Newton)
   2. Re: SHA256 hash WITHOUT using VFPEncryption.FLL (Tracy Pearson)
   3. Re: SHA256 hash WITHOUT using VFPEncryption.FLL (Paul Hill)
   4. RE: SHA256 hash WITHOUT using VFPEncryption.FLL (Paul Newton)
   5. RE: SHA256 hash WITHOUT using VFPEncryption.FLL (Paul Newton)
   6. RE: SHA256 hash WITHOUT using VFPEncryption.FLL (Tracy Pearson)
   7. RE: SHA256 hash WITHOUT using VFPEncryption.FLL (Paul Newton)
   8. Re: The - VFP is Old Tech Complaint... (Alan Bourke)
   9. [OT] Obama won't save the working class or the Jersey Shore
      (Pete Theisen)
  10. Re: The - VFP is Old Tech Complaint... (Ted Roche)
  11. Re: The - VFP is Old Tech Complaint... (Ed Leafe)
  12. Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win (Nicholas Geti)
  13. Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win (Nicholas Geti)
  14. Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win (Nicholas Geti)
  15. Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win (Nicholas Geti)
  16. Re: The - VFP is Old Tech Complaint... (M Jarvis)
Thanks Alan - unfortunately I am not a member and you need to be a member to 
access a lot of the good stuff ...

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Alan Bourke
Sent: 12 November 2012 13:00
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: SHA256 hash WITHOUT using VFPEncryption.FLL


> Does anybody have any idea on how I can create a SHA256 hash from a 
> string without using Craig Boyd's VFPEncryption.FLL?
> 

You might find some ideas on the news2news site about leveraging the Windows 
Crypto API. Don't think there's a native VFP version around unfortunately ...


Paul Newton <paul.new...@pegasus.co.uk> wrote:

>Hi
>
>Does anybody have any idea on how I can create a SHA256 hash from a
>string without using Craig Boyd's VFPEncryption.FLL?
>
>I am hesitant to use the FLL because it exposes methods whose name
>could be the same as other functions or procedures.
>
>Many thanks
>
>Paul Newton

Paul,

You can unload the library after you make your call into it.

Set Library to vfpencryption.fll
Sha256
Set library to

If you already use other libraries grab the loaded list with set("library") to 
restore them back.
-- 
Tracy


LMGTFY :-)

http://jammox.co.uk/server/snippets.php?sn=fox3

On 12 November 2012 12:42, Paul Newton <paul.new...@pegasus.co.uk> wrote:

> Hi
>
> Does anybody have any idea on how I can create a SHA256 hash from a string
> without using Craig Boyd's VFPEncryption.FLL?
>
> I am hesitant to use the FLL because it exposes methods whose name could
> be the same as other functions or procedures.
>
> Many thanks
>
> Paul Newton
>

-- 
Paul


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---


Thanks Tracy

I will consider that as a possibility.  No need to restore other libraries if 
you use Release Library vfpencryption.fll instead of Set Library To

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Tracy 
Pearson
Sent: 12 November 2012 13:16
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: SHA256 hash WITHOUT using VFPEncryption.FLL

Paul Newton <paul.new...@pegasus.co.uk> wrote:

>Hi
>
>Does anybody have any idea on how I can create a SHA256 hash from a 
>string without using Craig Boyd's VFPEncryption.FLL?
>
>I am hesitant to use the FLL because it exposes methods whose name 
>could be the same as other functions or procedures.
>
>Many thanks
>
>Paul Newton

Paul,

You can unload the library after you make your call into it.

Set Library to vfpencryption.fll
Sha256
Set library to

If you already use other libraries grab the loaded list with set("library") to 
restore them back.
--
Tracy
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1352743081.73911.yahoomail...@web46206.mail.sp1.yahoo.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to