IIRC, in addition to the memo field that contains the method code, there's a 
column in the SCX where the property and method names are all stored. Methods 
are preceded with an asterisk.

--
rk


-----Original Message-----
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Kurt
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 2:45 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: More Screen Hacking & Custom Methods...

Hey Folks,

 

Well, I was trucking right along on this Screen Hacking Utility I have been 
working on. And, of course, my Boss just LOVES to see the progress - when I 
show updated versions of a screen that I converted using this method - and gave 
the screen basic functionality - allowing it to actually Run!

 

And, now I ran into a strange problem. 

 

I figured that I would convert procedures in the PRG files into Custom Methods. 
My program actually generates a proper PROC.ENDPROC and the code within it - 
and this resides in the Methods memo field in the Form record in the screen/SCX 
file. And, if I open up the screen like a DBF - I can see it in there. But, 
alas, when I open the screen as a Form - and look at the Methods for the Form - 
the Custom methods do NOT Exist. And, in case you were curious - at the end of 
my program that Hacks the Screen - it DOES run the Compile command.

 

So - I'm kinda stumped on this one - and I am HOPING that someone here might 
have a clue as to what is going wrong.

 

TIA,

-K-

 



--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/DF1EEF11E586A64FB54A97F22A8BD0442181D1250D@ACKBWDDQH1.artfact.local
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to