_______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/51230b0a.6010...@hawthorncottage.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Back when data-entry involved punch cards or paper-tape there was always
a separate validation run by a different operative. Some errors still
got through, but very very few. I see no reason other than cost saving
why this should be discontinued just because the equipment has changed.
Good form design also plays a part e.g. date and currency fields should
be clearly identifiable by their layout.
- RE: [NF] Government Software Con... David Almada
- Re: [NF] Government Software Con... Gene Wirchenko
- Re: [NF] Government Software Controls Ken Dibble
- Re: [NF] Government Software Controls Gene Wirchenko
- Re: [NF] Government Software Controls Gene Wirchenko
- Re: [NF] Government Software Controls Stephen Russell
- Re: [NF] Government Software Controls Ken Dibble
- Re: [NF] Government Software Controls Ken Dibble
- Re: [NF] Government Software Controls Ken Dibble
- Re: [NF] Government Software Controls Gene Wirchenko
- Re: [NF] Government Software Controls AndyHC