One other thing, is it only slow when printing and not when previewing? Maybe a 
different printer between test and production?

Frank Cazabon <frank.caza...@gmail.com> wrote:

>How is the image referred to in the report?
>
>Sounds like the report has the path to the image in it and has
>difficulty finding that path in production.
>
>
>
>Jeff Johnson <j...@san-dc.com> wrote:
>
>>That's a problem Frank.  I don't see it on a test server, but they see
>
>>it in production.  Are reports faster is they are included in the exe?
>>
>>Jeff
>>
>>---------------
>>
>>Jeff Johnson
>>j...@san-dc.com
>>(623) 582-0323
>>
>>www.san-dc.com
>>www.arelationshipmanager.com
>>
>>On 10/13/2013 10:52 AM, Frank Cazabon wrote:
>>> How is the image referred to in the report?
>>>
>>> If you remove the image from the report does the report speed up?
>>>
>>> Jeff Johnson <j...@san-dc.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am working on an application (not developed by me) and the use
>>>> excluded reports.  All of the reports are in two locations; with
>the
>>>> exe
>>>> and with the data.  The logo (jpg) is also in both folders and also
>>>> compiled into the exe (not excluded).  Could any of this cause the
>>>> report to slow down when printing?
>>>>
>>>> TIA
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Jeff
>>>>
>>>> ---------------
>>>>
>>>> Jeff Johnson
>>>> j...@san-dc.com
>>>> (623) 582-0323
>>>>
>>>> www.san-dc.com
>>>> www.arelationshipmanager.com
>>>>
>>>>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4c51d955-4581-4ad6-8bc8-9ce91e8b7...@email.android.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to