On Tue, Oct 15, 2013, at 05:55 PM, AndyHC wrote:
> 
> I thought ms were committed to /critical/ updates for unsupported 
> software, makes sense - just the cost of defending a shower of class 
> action suits would justify it.

Nope. They don't update Windows 2000. They don't update Windows 3.1.
Canonical don't update Ubuntu beyond a couple of major versions back,
IIRC. 

XP has been out of mainstream support for 5 years now. After 8 April, XP
machines will be in a permanent state of zero-day vulnerability. 


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1381866971.17185.34387861.70c0d...@webmail.messagingengine.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to