In my case, none of the alternative methods worked. Of course, this may not
have been their fault, but it did seem sleazy at the time.
On Nov 21, 2013 9:37 AM, "Dave Crozier" <da...@flexipol.co.uk> wrote:

> Lew,
> Haven't had any problems at all with it here. When it does ask if you want
> the full blown version then just say no. I must say that on a couple of
> occasions it has been useful just to identify malware and then to use
> alternative methods to get rid of it. Also I still like MalwareBytes above
> all and even bought the paid for version for real time scanning.
>
> Dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Lew Schwartz
> Sent: 21 November 2013 14:24
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: RE: [NF] Malware protection vs cost
>
> I got roped in when it found a problem, but wanted $$ to remove it.
> Somewhat mal-ish itself.
> On Nov 21, 2013 9:14 AM, "Dave Crozier" <da...@flexipol.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > Superantispyware
> >
> > It's free for the stantard version
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Lew Schwartz
> > Sent: 21 November 2013 14:13
> > To: ProFox Email List
> > Subject: [NF] Malware protection vs cost
> >
> > I've been using Spyhunter, but at $40/year, it's too much,  imo.
> > Recommendations?  Suggestions?
> >
> >
> > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
> >   text/plain (text body -- kept)
> >   text/html
> > ---
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78cNqt82D7KRm_XwesM2zpqp1qSH=igbobbiickg8t+...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to