Hi Ed,
I haven't seen anything today from ProFox, but I did get this from you ???
I'm not a big football fan :)
Thanks for all your good work,
Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ed Leafe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 6:58 PM
Subject: Re: Trivial Infringements of Law 13 tangent
On Aug 15, 2006, at 7:37 AM, Gil Weber wrote:
Ah, if you look at the initial "tap" as a non-event, then you are
correct. The IFK went into the goal directly and so the restart would
be a goal kick.
I had not considered the initial "tap" to be a non-event.
What else could it be? If the ball didn't move, then it's a non- event. If
the ball moved but was not kicked, then it's simply 'placing' the ball
for the kicker. Either way, if that touch didn't put the ball into play,
and it is stationary, the subsequent kick into the goal puts the ball
into play, and since it's an IFK, the restart is a goal kick.
Of course, if the ball is still moving from the first touch, then the
ball was never legally put into play, and the kick is retaken.
-- Ed Leafe
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
