I know you've figured out the missing DLL but in addition to the last SP2 hotfix I also keep a vintage copy of the MS C++ runtime installer around. Having the 2 DLLs in the same folder with the VFP runtimes works, of course, but the installer can also come in handy at times.
-- rk -----Original Message----- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 1:15 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: VFP9SP2 app not liking VFPEncryption71.fll in WinXP test run Any clues, Profoxers? I realize it's the weekend and you all have lives, but hopefully one or two of you don't (and can help with this one). :-) On 2014-05-17 17:14, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote: > I developed my app on Win7; works great. I move it to an older WinXP > computer for some not-my-machine testing...it fails with an Error 1691 > on the SET LIBRARY TO VFPEncryption71.fll line. I researched the > error and found this on Craig's site: > http://www.sweetpotatosoftware.com/spsblog/2009/08/09/MajorVFPEncrypti > onUpdate.aspx > > 'If you are getting a "FLL is Invalid" error when running either of > these FLLs it is because you are missing the runtimes on the system > you are deploying your application on. What about the previous > vfpencryption.fll that used the VC++ 8.0 runtimes? I continue to > update to the latest Visual Studio (10.0 will be next) and I suggest > you do the same. Most VFP developers are using the vfpencryption71.fll > as the C runtime matches the one used for VFP 9.0 (msvcr71.dll) and it > provides the exact same functionality as vfpencryption.fll.' > > I just went and downloaded the latest onto the test machine....same > error. > > My VFP runtime files are right there in the application's folder, > which is c:\MBSS\FabMate, along with the latest VFPEncryption71.fll. > > Ideas? > > tia, > --Mike _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/DF1EEF11E586A64FB54A97F22A8BD044239A3F7892@ACKBWDDQH1.artfact.local ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
