It may be additive, but it's still a 'replace' statement and will create a new
field in the .fpt.
My recommendation would be to extract the existing memo content into a string
memvar, then show the user that with the date/time stamp. If they choose to
add notes, when they're done do 1 replace. If they don't add, or cancel, then
just leave everything as is.
Dan Covill
> Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 11:59:50 -0400
> From: mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: bottom of memo field
>
> Hi Thierry,
>
> I thought the same thing at first until I read that ADDITIVE clause.
> Still applies to bloat concern??
>
> Thanks,
> --Michael
>
>
> On 2014-08-11 11:50, Thierry Nivelet wrote:
> > Hi Rafael:
> >
> > You may want to avoid memo bloat:
> >
> > replace curList.pv_mo with '';
> > + Replicate('*',100) + Chr(13);
> > + Ttoc(Datetime()) + Chr(13);
> > + Replicate('*',100) + Chr(13);
> > + '' additive
> >
> > each REPLACE increases the .fpt size
> >
> > Thierry Nivelet
> > FoxInCloud
> > Give your VFP app a second life in the cloud
> > http://foxincloud.com/
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/bay169-w9189618407f3effba0eda38a...@phx.gbl
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
