MB Software Solutions wrote: > Whil Hentzen (Pro*) wrote: > > > >>> Kevin's TEXTMERGE idea seems to have fit the bill perfectly, so no need >>> for that...but thanks anyway! >>> >> So what was the problem in the first place, that textmerge solved? >> > The textmerge substituted the values explicitly, so that resolved what > wasn't seeming to work with private variables being referenced with the > question mark in front of them. Of course, that puts the onus on you to > make sure they're delimited correctly, whereas if the private vars had > worked as expected, that wouldn't be a concern.
But this still doesn't explain why the same code worked locally but not remotely. It WASs the same code, right? Whil _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
